The Glebe Society's aims include:
- the conservation of our Victorian and Federation heritage,
- ensuring progress is based on best-outcomes and is resident-friendly,
- providing the community with input into decisions which affect them,
- the enhancement of community spirit, and
- working cooperatively with other local organisations.
The Raison d'Étre of the Glebe Society
Fifty years ago the visitor to Glebe would have seen a very different suburb. The waterfront was cluttered with industrial sites, mainly belonging to the timber industry. Sometimes it would be possible to walk across Rozelle Bay, it was so choked with floating logs. There was just one small waterfront park, Marine Reserve, at the end of Glebe Point Road. White Bay Power Station belched out fumes that blackened washing as soon as it was hung out. Scattered throughout residential areas were a wide range of small factories, including foundries, soap and paint works, and many other noxious and polluting trades. Most dwellings had not seen a coat of paint in living memory – many of them were decayed, and their facades and balconies obscured by fibro and plywood. A considerable number were owned by slum landlords, who divided them into many small flats populated by transient residents.
New developments in Glebe include public art such as this spectacular fence at Glebe Public School, designed by Nuha Saad
It was a story repeated throughout the inner city. Expanding railways and cheaper cars brought the Australian dream of a new house with all mod cons on a quarter acre block within reach of the majority, and home ownership boomed in the suburbs. Inner areas such as Glebe were left to those who couldn't afford to leave, or had to find somewhere cheap. In those days it was rare to find someone who regarded Glebe as other than a slum, including the people who lived there. It was assumed that one day the whole suburb would be demolished, and when two new freeways were proposed to drive through Glebe, many people thought it progress. Similarly, the increasing tendency to knock down old houses (especially on large corner blocks) and replace them with cheap three or four storey walkups seemed like the inevitable march of the modern world.
It was not easy to see the beauty obscured by blight, accretion and neglect, but this was the particular talent of Kate and Bernard Smith and the other founder-members of The Glebe Society. In this they were supported by a change in public mood, heralded by the foundation of the National Trust and many local resident action groups that, for the first time, recognized the value of the past and resisted its indiscriminate and wholesale destruction. In their imaginations the fine craftsmanship and urban planning of the Victorians blazed into life again like the burnishing of tarnished brass. In the close bonds of the local residents they recognized the value of established, mutually supportive communities. From this moment, the heritage of that community and its future development became inextricably linked.
The great energy shown by The Society in its early years is a consequence of facing so many threats. Both freeways and developers threatened demolition. The freeways were stopped with one campaign, but a new town plan was needed to cope with developers, not just to prevent unnecessary demolitions, but to control those industrial sites, and as they inevitably became redundant, to ensure their best future use.
Parks for the People
The total occupation of the waterfront by industry raised a wonderful possibility. Perhaps it would be possible to secure continuous public access to the foreshore. This possibility, after thirty years of effort, is on the brink of realization. It is one of The Society's great triumphs, and is a major contribution to Sydney Harbour, as it links with the State Government's proposal of continuous waterfront access as far as Garden Island. This campaign fitted neatly with the need to remove polluting industries and increase high quality open space.
The Society also saw the possibility of linking the waterfront parks to those following original watercourses inland. The campaigns for restoration of Wentworth Park, once second only to Centennial Park, and for the regeneration of Orphan School Creek in Forest Lodge as natural bushland, are also well under way. Rezoning industrial land on the waterfront does have a cost. If the land cannot be bought or obtained outright, it can only become park by allowing some residential development.
The last of the waterfront industrial sites, the Australand site extending beyond Ferry Road and Forsyth Street, has now been residentially redeveloped. Fortunately, it was possible to combine the new open space with Council land, so one third will be waterfront park. Also, the heritage-listed Walter Burley Griffin incinerator, including Griffin's landscaping, has been restored.
Saving the Glebe Estate
Another early threat was the proposed sale of the Church of England lands that form part of the original land grant that gave Glebe its name. The Society provided the information and impetus that enabled the Whitlam Government to purchase all 740 dwellings, transferred to the NSW Department of Housing in 1984.
By saving the Glebe Estate the Society preserved both the community, many of whom had lived in Glebe for generations, and a rare example of housing and planning from the Gold Rush period onward.
By 1974, The Society had sufficiently established the value of the suburb for Glebe to be declared an Urban Conservation Area. Also in 1974 a reforming Leichhardt Council drew up a promising new Planning Scheme, but the next Council rescinded it in 1976. However, by 1983 a new Town Plan (known as Local Environment Plan No 20) had been gazetted that recognized Glebe as a Conservation Area and listed all buildings recorded by The National Trust as Items of Environmental Heritage. The change in public mood can be gauged by a change of State Government that put an end to the freeway plans and passed both a Heritage Act (1977) and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (1978), establishing a Court to hear planning appeals. LEP 20 also set a maximum density for new residential development (175 persons per hectare) that in normal circumstances limited it to two storeys (with rooms in the roof) over parking. Leichhardt Council also adopted a Development Control Plan (No 1) establishing general characteristics of design, form and height, including detailed recommendations for each distinctive area.
The spirit of these changes can best be seen on the Glebe Estate, where a young and talented Department of Housing team combined social and heritage objectives. The houses received new bathrooms and kitchens, a simple improvement that at one stroke has greatly extended the life of houses throughout the inner city. Where lot sizes permitted, extensions at the rear of dwellings made them suitable for families, and for the first time the decline in Glebe's population was reversed. The wave of young children and teenagers revitalized the local schools. The team took advantage of vacant sites and derelict houses to create purpose-designed housing for seniors and other infill dwellings employing transitional architectural styles that blended with traditional housing. Good examples can be seen in Darling, Catherine and Glebe Streets.
A Slum No More
The renovation of the Glebe Estate paralleled the revival of interest in the four fifths of Glebe which was privately owned. It is now common for Glebe houses to have their most prominent features restored, including external iron lace and paint, and interior ceiling roses and cornices. Modernization is typically limited to bathrooms and kitchens, with perhaps the rear opened out to create sunrooms and decks.
The revival of interest in Victorian urban housing has had a variety of consequences. It has raised the cost of such housing beyond the wildest imaginings of its former inhabitants, for whom it was a cheap refuge. With the outstanding exceptions of large parts of its commercial zones, the Glebe Estate and several hundred other Department of Housing properties, Glebe is now mainly owner-occupied (over 60% at the last census). Thus the number of students, for example, has declined drastically. Generally, social divisions have been sharpened. Almost the whole of Glebe has been restored. Its public areas, notably its library and waterfront parkland, have been extended and transformed.
Unfortunately, rising prices and the higher densities achievable in Victorian areas have also made Glebe a target for developers, car ownership has increased, and house occupancy rates have declined. New routes and more frequent buses have improved public transport, but the most dramatic change is the Glebe Society-initiated conversion of the spectacularly-engineered goods line to Light Rail. At the time of writing the extensions of the Light Rail westward to Dulwich Hill, further along the goods line, and eastward via Hickson Road and Barangaroo to the Quay, are being planned.
Most problematic development in recent years has been of two kinds, both the result of increasing property values. Firstly, those buying houses in Glebe are much richer, and are not necessarily attached to its heritage. Hence, attempts to extend and modify existing houses are more common (the Balmain syndrome). Secondly, developers pore over aerial photographs trying to identify and large backyards or non-heritage buildings so they can pop up a few townhouses (the Leichhardt syndrome).
It was with these challenges in mind that Leichhardt Council introduced Town Plan 2000, which has stricter environmental controls, reflecting concern about overdevelopment and the need to make new building sustainable. At the same time development control plans tightened up requirements in particular suburbs.
When Glebe became part of the City of Sydney in May, 2003, the City continued to apply Town Plan 2000. Eventually the City will institute a new town plan following community consultation. The City has gathered a lot of empirical data for the new plan, but at the time of writing there is no timetable for public exhibition and comment. The fringes of Glebe, which are affected by development in adjacent suburbs, remain areas of concern, as do the foreshore of the Bays opposite Glebe, which have a large impact but are generally outside local government control.
There are also a number of sites that, for a variety of reasons, resisted solutions for a long time. Probably the best known of these is the Abbey site, 156-60 Bridge Road. So far one heritage building on the site, Reussdale, has been renovated as a residence and the church is being restored for commercial use. The cottage called Hamilton is to be rebuilt as a duplex, and there will be seven townhouses along the rear of the site.
Bellevue, in Blackwattle Bay Park, has now been restored and a cafe approved. The restored Walter Burley Griffin Incinerator on the Australand/Fletchers site (see above) is proposed for community use. Both are Council-owned heritage buildings
At present the major development site is Harold Park. This will first need to be rezoned, and you can read about the progress of this so far under its own heading on this site. Included in Harold Park are the State heritage-listed Tramsheds, and these are proposed for a mixture of community and commercial use. The site is very large and it could be some years before any development is completed. The rezoning process itself is lengthy, and every part of it is a challenge..
Such problems are not unique to Glebe, but their solution requires a great deal of effort, often over decades. It is often said the threats to Glebe are never-ending, and this is a major factor in the resilience of The Glebe Society when so many other resident groups have vanished. Certainly The Society's role is never less than challenging, and your support is always valuable.
- Neil Macindoe Planning Convenor June 2010